condemned to death by an unwanted pregnancy or risk, or a miserable life keeping our children with starvation wages, just because because they are women! This will subject the employer in this democracy for the rich, with his emaciated face sexist and patriarchal!
Chile is one of the four countries in the world that prohibits abortion even in extreme situations such as having our no foal to a skull, a pregnancy resulting from rape or danger that is in our own lives. And those who suffer the brunt of this reality are, once again, working women and the poor that can not exceed the law and opt for illegal abortions paid safely and under the tutelage of a professional, what does women's access employers and the rich. Today, in the electoral cycle, politicians from the parliament to protect the profits of employers and manage our daily misery, we bring to the fore as a topic of national debate over a draft law on "therapeutic abortion": no is the first time that sounds this tune, is already the sixth time since 2003 only where the employer's policy had "discussed whether we can discuss" the project, as they "discuss whether it is possible to discuss" women are still dying because they can not decide and defend our own life.
The debate seems to be heated, as the flagship of the coalition, Eduardo Frei talks about his willingness to discuss with all sectors of the legalization of therapeutic abortion, supported by the PS, the PPD and the PRSD, who presented a project, while the right shows a Piñera declaring uncompromising very "pro-life" closing the discussion and shooting darts against Frei, who, indeed, in the nineties was declared absolutely anti-abortion and now "magically" appears to have reconsidered the issue and their eager race for the presidential chair now offers a generous hand to the women to recover those trusts that in the surveys to keep you on the edge Piñera elections. While his own party, the Christian Democrats, is opposed to abortion openly.
Also inside the church, some priests will completely close the door to the mere idea of \u200b\u200bdebating, and others, trying to be more open, not refuse, but to open the debate is no guarantee that will not end up condemning all abortion, as it announces it has historically reactionary Church.
Let , colleagues, readers and supporters to track those that appear to be opponents: the right, which was well known, states "pro-life" and drives under various materials, campaigns against abortion through its militant youth, the same right that the dictatorship welcomed the death of thousands of women, men and boys, who allowed the torture and disappearances, now talks about being for life! But that's not all, within the ranks of these vultures comes back a woman's face have also known enough to not remember, is that of Karla Rubilar (RN) who say they would vote in favor of the project (The Second) showing its more democratic mask despite the uncompromising statements Piñera, clearly this was not the mask that showed us when he made controversial in the case of "false detainees disappeared" dirtying the just struggle of family and human rights organizations, showing its true face , heir and defender of Pinochet's dictatorship, his face today hypocritically killer transvestite to talk about abortion terpéutico. A right that we know well as a clear enemy of workers and women workers and the poor.
However, another opponent: the Coalition, is rather vague, has driven many times the same project on therapeutic abortion and now engages in this dispute with the right word out to women yes, but not be solved with words or with projects that will rest in parliament our most urgent demands, it is true that projects submitted to parliament after are rejected by the opposition. It has also been the period of the coalition, when it has secured this right and has been maintained over the legacies of dictatorship until 1989 was legally in therapeutic abortion in Chile. The question is then why have some responsibility for the fact that parliament cure their bills? Absolutely they do, because they govern the right hand when attacking the working class, women and the rest of the oppressed. Have kept the binomial voted (on behalf of a false democratic will) for the UDI to assume the presidency of both the Senate, with Jovino Novoa, as the Chamber of Deputies Rodrigo Alvarez, who recently assumed reminded Jaime Guzmán and follows faithfully in his footsteps today clarified in advance that considered the bill unconstitutional: Jaime Guzmán declared that a woman was forced to carry a pregnancy "but come the malformed fetus, either result of rape or even if, as derived in death "and so, the right also exchanged vows with the Coalition for a another post, all with the goal of keeping intact the gains at the expense patterns of attacks and misery for the working class and for us women. Moreover, the Coalition today speaks of therapeutic abortion, but is silent against the Constitutional Court ruling in April last year we removed the Morning After Pill in the offices where we turn the poor and working: the Coalition said it would respect the ruling and since then no one has spoken not a word on the subject ... Do not be one of the more winks that make us always trying to be our friends, but in fact worsening attacking us and our living conditions?
After a debate such as the pill, the reactionary moral of the Church its policy of denying sexual and reproductive rights of women and youth (working and oppressed, because the rich can "pay" for those rights), continues to weigh. Why ought to be different today with this debate between the bosses' parties? While 80% of women, according to studies by the NGO Human, has agreements with therapeutic abortion (and the morning after pill)!
In contrast, from Bread and Roses Teresa Flores, strongly maintain that neither the coalition, let alone the Right ensure our rights, but on the contrary, as demonstrated by the failure of the TC. We are not against the recovery of the right therapeutic abortion, but believe that we can not trust the politicians to ensure employers and we believe it is not enough to respond to the problem of abortion and sexual freedom over our bodies because not in all cases ensures that women can decide on their own bodies, for example, against unwanted pregnancies. When abortion is a reality that leaves thousands of women under complicated health situations, risking imprisonment and even death for standing up to terrible living conditions, which happens at least 200,000 times per year, and sex education marked by a moral hypocrite, contraceptives that do not serve to avoid the no access and social misery to which we convicted, say,
working women only with our fellow workers can respond to struggle and mobilization, calling on women, men of the poor and students. Further action is required of all employers variant winks us today with a bill, perhaps, later removed until the Copper T, the same bosses' parties now download the crisis with layoffs and labor flexibility. So we appeal to the CUT, the vice-Anef woman, who like working class organizations must respond with women's organizations and students to fight for the right to contraception free and quality public service, right to legal abortion, free and open to any woman who requires sex education and no morals of the Church.
FREE NO ABORTION CONTRACEPTION, ABORTION NOT FREE AND DIE FOR FREE!
RIGHT FOR SEX EDUCATION WITHOUT THE MORAL OF THE CHURCH!
